CONNECT
Bring your agents into view.
Connect supported platforms to see your agents, their owners and the work they are meant to do. See where information is missing.
Agent Value Benchmark
Find what stands between
your agents and business value.
Compare each agent’s purpose with relevant cases in the value-case library. Check its business requirements, system connections, KPIs, baseline and outcome evidence. Get a prioritised plan for closing the gaps.
How it works
A clearer picture of the agents you connect.
BENCHMARK
Check what each agent needs.
Compare the agent with the value-case library. Review the required data, systems, decision rights and measures for that work.
PRIORITISE
Decide what is worth fixing.
Prioritise the gaps, name the people responsible and agree how to judge each improvement.
What a useful agent needs
Take a purchasing agent, for example.
A clear job and owner
A defined result and someone responsible for it.
A relevant business use
A task that matters to the purchasing team.
The right information
Permission to use the purchasing records needed for the task.
Clear limits and handoffs
The tools to do the work, rules for acting and a person to handle exceptions.
A way to measure success
Defined KPIs, a recorded baseline and linked outcome evidence. Targets describe the intended result; they are not achieved results.
Evidence it is being used
Actual usage, the quality of its work and how often people need to redo it.
Illustrative finding
A useful idea can still have gaps.
Supplier risk agentSample data
- Purpose & domain
- Defined · Procurement
- Procurement access
- Gap · Web search only
- Business KPIs
- Gap · No time or coverage target
- Outcome evidence
- Unknown · No linked purchasing decision
Next step: connect the approved purchasing data and agree how the team will measure a useful result.
See which agents need work
and which may be ready to do more.
The purpose needs work
The agent may duplicate work or solve a problem that matters too little. Review whether to redesign or combine it.
The setup is incomplete
The task makes sense, but the agent lacks something it needs. Fix the gaps before expanding its use.
There is evidence it helps
Results support a useful contribution within the assessed scope. Review where it could do more.
More evidence is needed
The purpose or results are unclear. Confirm the facts before deciding what comes next.
Keep the improvement plan current.
Daily updates show new agents, changed versions and open findings. Your team or a delivery partner works through the prioritised plan, tests the changes and approves redeployment. Use the Novagentica platform to compare actual use and outcomes with the starting point, then decide what to improve next.
See the complete platform →Let’s find the improvements worth making.
Tell us which agents you use and what you expect from them. We’ll agree where to start.